久久精品30_一本色道久久精品_激情综合视频_欧美日韩一区二区高清_好看的av在线不卡观看_国产自产精品_91久久黄色_午夜亚洲福利_欧美黄在线观看_国内自拍一区

Home / English Column / Business (new) / In Industry / Real Estate Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Debate over Property Tax Heats up
Adjust font size:

As the government's latest wave of macro-control measures aimed at the housing sector unfolds, the debate about the immovable property tax is once again surfacing.

 

Although experts and analysts generally agree that the proposed tax could, to some extent, curb property speculation and rein in rising prices, and be applied sooner, they are divergent on how it should be levied.

 

Taxation policy has long been viewed as an effective tool to adjust the real estate market.

 

In a State Council executive meeting on May 17, the central government vowed to use a mix of credit, tax and land policy to cool the currently overheated housing market.

 

As of June 1, a 5.5 percent transaction tax is now being charged to people who sell their property within five years of purchase a policy many say is designed to discourage investment-oriented property demand.

 

But many experts say the immovable property tax, which is imposed on owners of properties, is more effective than the transaction tax to restrain property speculation.

 

"The property tax is an indispensable instrument to drive out excessive housing demand resulting from speculation and investment purposes," said Yi Xianrong, a researcher with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

 

The property tax would increase property investors' costs, which would make some think twice before investing in property, Yi explained.

 

And some experts say the property tax could also help drive down housing prices.

 

Currently the land fee, which some estimate accounts for 40 percent of developers' costs, is calculated into construction costs, an arrangement that experts say leads to high property prices.

 

The developers will not have to pay the land fee if the property tax is levied, which is likely to result in the property price falling, experts say.

 

However, there are concerns that although homebuyers will pay less for property, they will have to pay more to maintain their houses, as they will have to pay the tax.

 

"It (the imposition of immovable property tax) will become a little bit easier for people to buy houses, but it will likely make it harder to maintain them," said a researcher with the Development Research Center (DRC), a government think tank.

 

"So the tax regime should be designed carefully in order not to add unbearable costs on to ordinary homeowners," the researcher added, declining to be named.

 

But experts are divided about how and when the proposed tax should be levied, such as on which property types the tax should be levied.

 

All household residential properties should be included in the tax category, according to a research paper on immovable property tax released by a cabinet-affiliated think tank last week.

 

The paper, jointly prepared by the DRC of the State Council and the US Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, a non-profit organization, proposed that a certain amount of household residential property should be exempted from the tax, in a bid to avoid adding to the living expenses of homebuyers.

 

The paper also proposed that properties used by government, military and diplomatic establishments, and other public property, should be exempted from the property tax.

 

And land used for agriculture and farmers' living quarters should also be exempted from the property tax, according to the research paper, which recommends the immovable property tax rate be set between 0.3 percent and 0.8 percent.

 

In comparison, in Vancouver, Canada, where property tax is a main source of local revenue, the property tax rate is set between 0.3 percent and 36 percent.

 

The differential tax rate is designed to keep the income gap from widening.

 

Property tax will be reduced by 30 percent to 50 percent for properties used by those older than 65, or retired servicemen or disabled people. Tax on other types of properties will be higher than 10 percent.

 

But some experts believe that the immovable property tax should largely be targeting those high-earners, "as this tax is an important means to balance the income gap," said Yin Bocheng, a researcher with the Finance Studies Centre at Fudan University.

 

In Vancouver, a much higher tax rate is applied on the second homes of its local citizens.

 

Properties for rental, villas and high-end apartments should be the first batch of properties to be levied with the immovable property tax, suggested Jia Kang, a researcher with a Ministry of Finance-affiliated research institute.

 

Though disagreement remains on taxable properties, experts agree that an adequate infrastructure should be put in place first if the property tax is to be well-implemented and effective.

 

"Before the tax is levied, there should be some basic infrastructure such as a detailed and accurate property registration database and a scientific land valuation method," said Yi Xianrong.

 

"Only when these preparations are done can the property tax be implemented efficiently," said Yi.

 

"The imposition of immovable property tax is a very complex issue," Xie Fuzhan, deputy director of the DRC, said at a symposium last week. "Only with good design can we reduce any possible glitches when the tax is really applied."

 

However, the need for prudence and adequate infrastructure should not constitute an excuse to indefinitely delay the imposition of immovable property tax, Yi stressed.

 

(China Daily June 6, 2006)

Debate over Property Tax Heats up

 

As the government's latest wave of macro-control measures aimed at the housing sector unfolds, the debate about the immovable property tax is once again surfacing.

 

Although experts and analysts generally agree that the proposed tax could, to some extent, curb property speculation and rein in rising prices, and be applied sooner, they are divergent on how it should be levied.

 

Taxation policy has long been viewed as an effective tool to adjust the real estate market.

 

In a State Council executive meeting on May 17, the central government vowed to use a mix of credit, tax and land policy to cool the currently overheated housing market.

 

As of June 1, a 5.5 percent transaction tax is now being charged to people who sell their property within five years of purchase a policy many say is designed to discourage investment-oriented property demand.

 

But many experts say the immovable property tax, which is imposed on owners of properties, is more effective than the transaction tax to restrain property speculation.

 

"The property tax is an indispensable instrument to drive out excessive housing demand resulting from speculation and investment purposes," said Yi Xianrong, a researcher with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

 

The property tax would increase property investors' costs, which would make some think twice before investing in property, Yi explained.

 

And some experts say the property tax could also help drive down housing prices.

 

Currently the land fee, which some estimate accounts for 40 percent of developers' costs, is calculated into construction costs, an arrangement that experts say leads to high property prices.

 

The developers will not have to pay the land fee if the property tax is levied, which is likely to result in the property price falling, experts say.

 

However, there are concerns that although homebuyers will pay less for property, they will have to pay more to maintain their houses, as they will have to pay the tax.

 

"It (the imposition of immovable property tax) will become a little bit easier for people to buy houses, but it will likely make it harder to maintain them," said a researcher with the Development Research Center (DRC), a government think tank.

 

"So the tax regime should be designed carefully in order not to add unbearable costs on to ordinary homeowners," the researcher added, declining to be named.

 

But experts are divided about how and when the proposed tax should be levied, such as on which property types the tax should be levied.

 

All household residential properties should be included in the tax category, according to a research paper on immovable property tax released by a cabinet-affiliated think tank last week.

 

The paper, jointly prepared by the DRC of the State Council and the US Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, a non-profit organization, proposed that a certain amount of household residential property should be exempted from the tax, in a bid to avoid adding to the living expenses of homebuyers.

 

The paper also proposed that properties used by government, military and diplomatic establishments, and other public property, should be exempted from the property tax.

 

And land used for agriculture and farmers' living quarters should also be exempted from the property tax, according to the research paper, which recommends the immovable property tax rate be set between 0.3 percent and 0.8 percent.

 

In comparison, in Vancouver, Canada, where property tax is a main source of local revenue, the property tax rate is set between 0.3 percent and 36 percent.

 

The differential tax rate is designed to keep the income gap from widening.

 

Property tax will be reduced by 30 percent to 50 percent for properties used by those older than 65, or retired servicemen or disabled people. Tax on other types of properties will be higher than 10 percent.

 

But some experts believe that the immovable property tax should largely be targeting those high-earners, "as this tax is an important means to balance the income gap," said Yin Bocheng, a researcher with the Finance Studies Centre at Fudan University.

 

In Vancouver, a much higher tax rate is applied on the second homes of its local citizens.

 

Properties for rental, villas and high-end apartments should be the first batch of properties to be levied with the immovable property tax, suggested Jia Kang, a researcher with a Ministry of Finance-affiliated research institute.

 

Though disagreement remains on taxable properties, experts agree that an adequate infrastructure should be put in place first if the property tax is to be well-implemented and effective.

 

"Before the tax is levied, there should be some basic infrastructure such as a detailed and accurate property registration database and a scientific land valuation method," said Yi Xianrong.

 

"Only when these preparations are done can the property tax be implemented efficiently," said Yi.

 

"The imposition of immovable property tax is a very complex issue," Xie Fuzhan, deputy director of the DRC, said at a symposium last week. "Only with good design can we reduce any possible glitches when the tax is really applied."

 

However, the need for prudence and adequate infrastructure should not constitute an excuse to indefinitely delay the imposition of immovable property tax, Yi stressed.

 

(China Daily June 6, 2006)

 

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Property Tax Surge Ebbs
Shanghai to Tax Real Estate Speculators
?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
久久精品30_一本色道久久精品_激情综合视频_欧美日韩一区二区高清_好看的av在线不卡观看_国产自产精品_91久久黄色_午夜亚洲福利_欧美黄在线观看_国内自拍一区
99国产精品视频免费观看一公开| 欧美日韩国产高清一区二区 | 久久99久久99| 亚洲高清久久久| 亚洲日穴在线视频| 欧美丝袜丝nylons| 国产精品99一区二区| 欧美福利精品| 亚洲视频一区| 日韩一级网站| 六月天综合网| 在线精品视频免费观看| 色素色在线综合| 欧美精品三级在线观看| 欧美一区二区黄| 在线播放91灌醉迷j高跟美女 | 国产成人8x视频一区二区 | 久热这里只精品99re8久| 六月婷婷久久| 欧美顶级少妇做爰| 日韩女优制服丝袜电影| 国产亚洲一本大道中文在线| 国产精品国产自产拍高清av| 亚洲日本欧美天堂| 日韩电影在线观看一区| 国产精品中文有码| 午夜精品短视频| 亚洲深爱激情| 亚洲国产精选| 国产精品免费区二区三区观看| 免播放器亚洲| 欧美日韩国产a| 国产女同性恋一区二区| 夜夜嗨av一区二区三区中文字幕 | 日韩欧美色综合| 精品国产亚洲一区二区三区在线观看 | 日韩亚洲欧美精品| 亚洲视频成人| 91成人在线观看喷潮| 日韩免费视频一区二区| 国产精品久久久久婷婷| 一区二区三区在线影院| 久久草av在线| 欧美一区二区在线| 久热这里只精品99re8久| 日韩午夜电影av| 综合久久综合久久| 国产综合久久久久久鬼色 | 欧美无乱码久久久免费午夜一区| 精品国产精品一区二区夜夜嗨| 亚洲精品免费播放| 成人免费毛片嘿嘿连载视频| 国产精品免费看| 久久婷婷成人综合色| 水蜜桃久久夜色精品一区的特点| 国产精品一区二区三区乱码| aa国产精品| 久久亚洲捆绑美女| 日本成人超碰在线观看| 欧美视频在线观看| 91精品国产综合久久久蜜臀粉嫩| 亚洲美女免费在线| 99这里只有久久精品视频| 久久久久一区二区| 国产精品色噜噜| 国产成人免费视频网站| 另类av一区二区| 日本一区二区三级电影在线观看| 九九**精品视频免费播放| 欧美女激情福利| 91精品国产综合久久福利| 亚洲国产精品一区二区久久恐怖片 | 日本久久电影网| 综合久久国产九一剧情麻豆| 盗摄精品av一区二区三区| 色婷婷精品久久二区二区蜜臂av| 中文字幕 久热精品 视频在线| 精品一区二区三区免费毛片爱| 亚洲高清不卡一区| 国产午夜精品福利| 粉嫩一区二区三区性色av| 欧美吻胸吃奶大尺度电影| 亚洲一区二区三区美女| 极品av少妇一区二区| 国产欧美精品在线观看| 99久久综合国产精品| 日韩视频在线你懂得| 国产一区二区三区在线观看免费 | 99视频在线精品| 日韩欧美激情一区| 另类综合日韩欧美亚洲| 麻豆成人精品| 亚洲国产美国国产综合一区二区| 一本色道久久| 一区二区三区av电影| av成人毛片| 亚洲综合一二三区| 国产一区二区精品| 亚洲国产精品一区二区久久| 国产精品久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩久久| 伊人天天综合| 亚洲精品日韩专区silk| 成人性生交大合| 精品99久久久久久| 欧美在线国产| 国产精品久久午夜| 夜久久久久久| 午夜精品福利在线| 91搞黄在线观看| 亚洲丰满少妇videoshd| 久久国产直播| 久99久精品视频免费观看| 91精品国产综合久久香蕉麻豆| 国产福利精品一区二区| 久久人人爽人人爽| 亚洲东热激情| 亚洲电影第三页| 一本高清dvd不卡在线观看 | 色欧美88888久久久久久影院| 秋霞国产午夜精品免费视频| 欧美综合亚洲图片综合区| 激情亚洲综合在线| 久久婷婷成人综合色| 亚洲激情在线| 亚洲国产片色| 亚洲婷婷在线视频| 国产精品手机视频| 国产资源在线一区| 久久精品在线免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩| 日韩精品电影在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美高清| 狠狠综合久久av一区二区老牛| 亚洲精品免费播放| 欧美一区二区视频免费观看| 欧美韩日精品| 日韩avvvv在线播放| 精品剧情v国产在线观看在线| 国产一区日韩欧美| 免费av成人在线| www精品美女久久久tv| 亚洲国产mv| 国内精品免费在线观看| 国产精品久久毛片av大全日韩| 久久久精品午夜少妇| 成人久久18免费网站麻豆| 亚洲美女视频一区| 日韩精品综合一本久道在线视频| 亚洲大胆视频| 国产精品综合在线视频| 亚洲精品你懂的| 精品国产伦一区二区三区观看方式 | 欧美日韩一区二区不卡| 欧美区日韩区| 精品一区二区三区免费观看| 亚洲视频综合在线| 欧美一区二区三区在线视频| 在线精品一区| 成人性生交大片| 日韩和的一区二区| 国产精品成人免费| 日韩一级黄色片| 蜜桃久久精品乱码一区二区| 欧美一区二区三区免费看| 日韩精品电影在线观看| 亚洲品质自拍视频| 2024国产精品| 欧美精品乱码久久久久久按摩 | 亚洲午夜羞羞片| 久久精品视频免费| 欧美伦理视频网站| 欧美亚洲免费| 亚洲电影在线| 91免费视频网址| 国产美女精品人人做人人爽 | 亚洲在线国产日韩欧美| 蜜桃精品在线观看| 日韩精品在线一区| 久久久福利视频| 天天色图综合网| 欧美日韩国产综合一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产日韩| 国产91高潮流白浆在线麻豆| 久久久亚洲精华液精华液精华液| 欧美日韩成人综合天天影院| 99视频在线观看一区三区| 亚洲成人一区二区| 欧美激情综合五月色丁香| 亚洲一区激情| 91视频在线看| 日韩美女天天操| 国内精品美女在线观看| 国产欧美日韩卡一| 亚洲综合电影一区二区三区| 国产精品一卡二卡| 久久青青草综合| 91美女片黄在线观看| 91视频免费播放| 久久久久网址|